The tragic crash of an Air Force Harbin Z-9 helicopter on August 6, 2025, brought Ghana to a standstill as the nation mourned the loss of two cabinet ministers, three other senior officials of the State and the three crew members on board. As the nation mourned, another crisis quietly unfolded: a sea of information disorder flooded social media and even mainstream media platforms, distorting facts and deepening public confusion.

Long before any official statement was released, social media had already erupted with speculative narratives: unverified casualty lists, conspiracy theories and graphic content about the crash. One can only imagine how the children or spouses of the crash victims would have felt if they had unknowingly learnt of the unfortunate incident while casually scrolling through their social media feeds, especially in an age where social media is woven into the fabric of daily life.

Additionally, videos from unrelated aviation accidents, some dating back years and others from entirely different countries, were repackaged and circulated as if they depicted the crash. WhatsApp groups, Facebook pages, and even some mainstream outlets inadvertently amplified these inaccuracies, creating a digital storm of confusion and fear.

This narrative of digital fog is a stark reminder of how vulnerable Ghana’s information ecosystem has become in the face of rapid digitalisation and the proliferation of unregulated content. Yet, this crisis did not emerge in isolation. It was preceded by the rampant spread of misinformation, disinformation and hate speech that has plagued the country in recent years.

Altitude Lost: The Collapse of Credible Discourse

Unlike misinformation, which may stem from confusion or error, disinformation is crafted with the intent to deceive, distort, and destabilise. In recent years, Ghana has witnessed several troubling instances, from election-related disinformation involving doctored images and fabricated videos aimed at misleading voters to sensational prophetic declarations intended to stir fear and confusion.

The health sector has not been spared. Remember the COVID period where false claims about vaccines and miracle cures spread like wildfire, eroding public confidence and putting lives at risk. And oh, then comes the venom of Hate Speech. Ethnic slurs hurled by public figures and ordinary citizens, campaign rhetoric that mocks the vulnerable, and social media trolls that threaten journalists and activists with impunity. TikTok videos glorifying violence against prominent individuals have gone viral, turning cruelty and hate into entertainment.

These examples reflect a deeper challenge: the deliberate distortion of reality for political gain, ideological warfare, or personal vendetta. And perhaps most alarming of all, traditional media, once the bastion of truth, now often trades accuracy for speed, leaving the public to navigate a minefield of half-truths and manipulated narratives.

A Legislative and Regulatory Response

In response to this growing threat, the Ministry of Communication, Digital Technology and Innovation (MOCDTI) has announced plans to introduce a Bill to address the growing spate of Misinformation, Disinformation and Hate Speech. The proposed legislation is intended to strengthen legal safeguards against the deliberate creation and circulation of false or harmful digital content, empowering statutory bodies to act decisively while respecting the constitutional rights of citizens.

Of course, within the context of democracy and fundamental human rights, valid questions can be raised about enforcement, oversight, and the potential for abuse. Who determines what constitutes “misinformation”? How will the law distinguish between intentional falsehoods and genuine errors? And how can Ghana ensure that regulation does not become censorship?

These concerns must be addressed through inclusive stakeholder consultations. The success of the Bill will depend not only on its legal robustness, but on its ethical clarity and operational transparency. It must be a tool for protection, not control. The Minister responsible for the Ministry, Honourable Sam George, has emphasised that the Bill is not designed to suppress free speech, but rather to protect the integrity of public discourse. As he aptly put it, “Freedom of expression is a cornerstone of our democracy, but where your right to express ends, your duty not to mislead begins.”

While there is currently no comprehensive legislation specifically addressing mis/disinformation and hate speech, certain existing legal provisions do engage with aspects of the information disorder. Notably, Section 185 of the Criminal and Other Offences Act, 1960 (Act 29) criminalises the publication of false reports that harm the credit or reputation of the State.

Similarly, section 208 of the same Act considers the publication of false news a misdemeanour. Under these provisions, a person may only be absolved if there is sufficient evidence to demonstrate that reasonable steps were taken to verify the accuracy of the statement or report before its publication.

Again, section 76 of the Electronic Communications Act, 2008 (Act 775) criminalises false communication. The implementation of these and other existing legislative provisions has often been marked by challenges, largely due to ambiguity and inconsistent application. It is therefore essential that the new Bill be drafted with precision and clarity to prevent misinterpretation and ensure consistent enforcement.

Rebuilding Trust in the Information Age

The August 6 helicopter crash was a national tragedy. But the misinformation that followed was a systemic failure. As Ghana mourns its losses, it must also reckon with the urgent need to rebuild trust in its information systems, particularly about national disasters.

The proposed legislation is a step in that direction, but its success will depend on inclusive dialogue, robust safeguards, and a shared national resolve to protect both truth and freedom. This means investing in media accountability, strengthening public institutions, and fostering a culture of responsible digital citizenship. It means equipping journalists, influencers, and everyday users with the tools to verify before they amplify. And it means recognising that in today’s world, misinformation is not just a nuisance, it is a threat to democracy, public health, and national cohesion.

DISCLAIMER: The Views, Comments, Opinions, Contributions and Statements made by Readers and Contributors on this platform do not necessarily represent the views or policy of Multimedia Group Limited.

DISCLAIMER: The Views, Comments, Opinions, Contributions and Statements made by Readers and Contributors on this platform do not necessarily represent the views or policy of Multimedia Group Limited.



Source: myjoyonline.com