Sam George, Minister for Communication, Digital Technology and Innovations (middle) flanked by Alex Okyere, MD of MultiChoice Ghana (left) and the Board Chairman of MultiChoice Ghana (right)
Sam George, Minister for Communication, Digital Technology and Innovations (middle) flanked by Alex Okyere, MD of MultiChoice Ghana (left) and the Board Chairman of MultiChoice Ghana (right)

A looming deadline set by Ghana’s Communications Minister Sam George for MultiChoice to reduce DStv subscription prices has intensified scrutiny of structural issues within the country’s pay-TV sector.

The minister’s ultimatum demanding price cuts or risking license revocation—resonates with consumers facing steep increases, including a 120% rise in the basic “Access” package from GH₵45 in 2021 to GH₵99 in 2025.

While some consumers welcome regulatory intervention, concerns mount over potential disruptions to premium sports and entertainment content.

Economists argue the core issue lies in market concentration rather than pricing alone. Dr. Acheampong notes Ghana’s pay-TV sector lacks the competitive pressure seen in telecommunications, operating with limited domestic alternatives while shouldering high foreign-currency content licensing costs.

“Regulating prices without addressing monopolistic structures treats symptoms, not causes,” he states, highlighting how global content deals, satellite infrastructure expenses, and exchange volatility complicate cost structures.

Policy think tank IMANI Africa further warns the minister’s public ultimatum risks setting a dangerous precedent for state interference, potentially undermining investor confidence in Ghana’s market principles.

The standoff has renewed calls for institutional reforms. Dr. Acheampong advocates establishing an independent consumer protection authority to fairly assess pricing and enforce competition addressing current fragmentation of oversight across multiple agencies.

A compromise path may involve MultiChoice enhancing pricing transparency while offering tiered discounts, coupled with government efforts to facilitate market entry for competitors.

Analysts caution that knee-jerk regulatory threats could jeopardize Ghana’s economic recovery targets, emphasizing balanced solutions that protect consumers without destabilizing market confidence. With an August 7 deadline approaching, the outcome may signal broader shifts in Ghana’s approach to digital market governance.



Source: newsghana.com.gh